![]() Estimating dynamic state preferences from united nations voting data. Available at SSRN: When using the ideal point data, please cite: Bailey, Michael A., Anton Strezhnev, and Erik Voeten. When using the raw UN data, please cite: Erik Voeten "Data and Analyses of Voting in the UN General Assembly" Routledge Handbook of International Organization, edited by Bob Reinalda (published May 27, 2013). There are also dyadic agreement scores, See the Bailey, Strezhnevr, Voeten article for why these should not be used in most instances. The ideal point estimates are based on sessions, not years. Code to estimate ideal points and issue ideal points are available at. "Estimating dynamic state preferences from United Nations voting data." Journal of Conflict Resolution 61.2 (2017): 430-456. It also contains ideal point estimates derived from these votes as described in Bailey, Michael A., Anton Strezhnev, and Erik Voeten. The dataset includes issue codes and descriptions. Note the codebook as there are some issues with dates and other features of the raw data, which are pieced together from numerous sources. There will be an update to the raw data, likely in the Fall. Moreover, "important votes" are also not yet coded for these years. ![]() Note that for the five most recent years, failed votes and votes on amendments and paragraphs have not yet been added. Note that most votes take place in the Fall but some votes also occur in the spring of the following year. This is a dataset of roll-call votes in the UN General Assembly 1946-2022 (sessions 1-77). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |